10/23/2021 0 Comments Page Up And Down In Vi Editor For Mac
I use Mac OS, iTerm, and vim, and unfortunately I dont know of too many resources for."There's only so many things one can usefully commit to memory"First, you do not need to yank and delete the latter will also put the deleted contents into the (default or specified) register. Terminal command screen will not split windows vertically. Each of these commands puts the vi editor into insert mode thus, the key must be pressed to terminate the entry of text and to put the vi editor back into command mode. The following commands allow you to insert and add text. The main purpose of an editor is to create, add, or modify text for a file.Key Result Key Result PageDown or Ctrl+F Move down one. :move +1 / :move -2 this doesnt clobber the register, and you can also move entire ranges.You can easily define key mappings to shorten this.When you're in vim and have a file open, you can split your screen multiple. Alternatively, you can use the :move command, i.e.
Page Up And Down In Vi Editor How To Walk OrYou learn what's useful to you at the moment. You don't "remember" how to walk or use a pencil, you just think about the goal (move body over there, write sonnet) and muscle memory takes care of the details.Most vimmers have had the experience of someone watching over their shoulder and they say "wait, how did you do that." And then you have to pause and think it through, because you yourself don't know anymore, it's just in you.It would be ludicrous to try to learn all of vim, and it's absolutely unnecessary for using vim (or any other fine grained editor) effectively. Smart IPTV appen vs IPTV Smarters pro mac - Frlngning av test gller endast om du.As jvanenk says elsewhere in here, it's muscle memory, not memorization. 1 cant find any way to change channels up and down by just swiping. You switch vi to input mode by entering any one of several vi input. The positioning commands operate only while vi is in command mode. In terms of general purpose editing, I don't think it's possible to make something "more advanced" than Vim, just different.Of course in the GUI and IDE department there are many advancements, but how much are these worth? The answer is that if you pour millions of dollars into IDEs for constrained languages like Java you are going to get some specialized tools that outperform general tools like Vim or Emacs without similar language-specific optimization. Vim is a reasonably optimal mapping of all the keys on the keyboard to general purpose editing tasks with reasonably optimal internal grammar for combining commands in a logical way. You can use it over a high latency flaky SSH connection surprisingly effectively.The notion of state-of-the-art is a red herring. You can also use it whether you are on Mac, Windows, Linux or whatever future OS comes out. I just say: "Linux is my IDE, vim is my text editor." Everything their IDEs can do, I can do with either vim alone or a combination of vim + shell/python utils. The overwhelming majority of people at my school use Visual Studio, they look at me funny when I use vim. I can get some amazingly powerful plugins for specific uses (Fugitive makes "state of the art" git GUIs like Tower look like Playskool toys), but its bare functionality for manipulating text files is enough to get my comfortable and productive in any new language quickly, and I know I'll never have to learn a new editor for the rest of my life.I like your comments on the merits of IDEs vs. Vim is a similar foundation for text editing. I'd rather have 200 CLI utilities than 10,000 special purpose apps with thousands of non-orthogonal knobs and dials. Personally that feels stunting to me I want to try out new technologies at will without feeling unproductive until some monolithic software package decides to catch up.Over the years through all the GUI advancements, the UNIX philosophy has proven that it still provides some of, if not the most fertile ground for creative hacking. ![]() Don't think of it as knowledge competing for headspace for languages and quirks but as knowledge that augments those arcane bits.For your :q! example, it looks daunting but you really don't end up memorizing it verbatim like that, much like you don't memorize adding semicolons verbatim to the end of your C# lines of code or adding closing tags to markup languages, it's just part of the language, a line end implicitly requires a semicolon so you just do it, vim commands are prefixed with colons so you just do that too.The q is quit, which is hardly any worse than remembering Cmd-q or Ctrl-q is quitting for OS level shortcuts and the exclamation mark means "force", so it's usually unnecessary unless you're trying to quit without saving your changes, or doing something the command otherwise wouldn't normally allow. Also, I kinda like syntax highlighting in my editor.I'd say it's an old interface, but that it's still state of the art (there's a reason there's a vi/vim mode or plugin for every major editor except emacs and that you've seen a resurgence of modal editors as the programming world has moved away from boilerplate laden languages). But I wouldn't use it for remote text editing unless it was an emergency. This works so incredibly well because the editing phase itself has no latency and saving 2-3 kB of (compressed) source doesn't take longer than a few seconds over the worst of connections.Now, does vi(m) have a similar feature or did you mean (as I expect you did) that editing over a terminal connection to a vi instance that runs on the actual server was surprisingly effective? Because if you did mean that, you haven't seen actual bad connections yet -)Don't get me wrong, I always have a Terminal window open, I love the command line. Essentially, the editor pulls the file, displays it for modification, and commits it back to the server when I press CMD-S. Right now my typical MO is to open an SFTP connection to a remote dev server and edit the files on it by using an SFTP-capable editor. Outlook for mac foldersFortunately, it's not inconsistent with my own:Optimization pays the greatest dividends to tasks which:On (2), length, I don't recall any of my meta editing tasks involving "100 keystrokes and a mouse movement." Customizable shortcuts can trim down the outliers.On (3), frequency, this surely depends on the person and task. The fundamental philosophy of vi (a full-screen curses editor based on ed with its commandset) continues through the modern incarnation (though I've got to admit that going back to old-school, un-featured 'vi' instances sucks).While the free versions are now generally available, I ended up learning and unlearning a lot of emacs when I switched to a shop that 1) didn't have it and 2) the boss wouldn't allow it to be installed (didn't know enough at the time to realize that was a prime hint to up and leave).I've saved myself having to unlearn a great deal of stuff by sticking with vi/vim.Now: if you've got an editor which works for you _and_ can offer the same promise of persistance, bully for you.But at least now you understand the appeal.Your point is indisputable. Ports exist on a great number of other platforms.As with other 'Nix tools, a key advantage of being a free software program is that it tends not to up and get replaced. And if it really bothers you, you can configure vim to prompt you for an action if it would normally require a ! and you left it off.For the subsequent quarter century, I've used iterations of the same tool, as my principle editor since the mid-1990s.Since then I've used: WP4x+, WordStar, DOS EDIT, EDLIN, TSO/ISPF editor, MacWrite, MS Word in multiple incarnations, AmiPro, EVE and EDT on Vaxen, and a slew of other proprietary editors (as well as Emacs, pico/nano, ae, Lyx, AbiWord, etc.).Vi/vim is a standard you'll find on any 'Nix box, from BSD to SysV4 to Linux to Mac. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorSam ArchivesCategories |